The working artifacts
Every doc the study calls for, drafted to v0 so we have something real to hand to brewers, nonprofits, venues, and counsel. Edit in place as calls come back and language is blessed.
LiveSwell track
Validation-track artifacts
LiveSwell
1–4% ABV positioning + give-back model — for contract-brewer and retail/bar conversations.
Open →
Cost per bbl, MOQs, tank time, packaging — to be logged from corridor contract-brewer calls.
Open →
Exact wording before any 'proceeds to charity' marketing. Oregon rules TBD with counsel.
Open →
Recipe ownership, minimums, tank time, exit — plus the 11-question disqualifier-first set.
Open →
K4C track
Operating-track artifacts
Kegs for a Cause
The one-pager the brewery ask promises. Host logistics, what K4C handles, charitable through-line.
Open →
Recruiting the 6+ rotating nonprofits. What a night gets them: audience, check, content.
Open →
Repeatable event template. Timeline, budget lines, break-even-plus math, owners.
Open →
Per-event: raised, costs, donated, to whom, when — published.
Open →
Spans both tracks
Cross-cutting artifacts
Both
The July 2026 decision: for-profit LiveSwell + fiscally-sponsored K4C, mirroring the Finnegans template. Entities, funding, and why this shape.
Open →
Give-back rules, federal TTB permits, and open Oregon (OLCC) licensing questions for K4C, LiveSwell private-label, and a full brewery later.
Open →
Both tracks, GO criteria, five green lights, capital ladder and why a turnkey brewery purchase is not a shortcut.
Open →
Consolidated question list — entity choice, give-back rules, OLCC licensing, sponsor agreements. Cheaper than piecemeal.
Open →
Status
These are drafts, not deliverables
Anything marked draft v0 in the page eyebrow is placeholder-quality language written to unblock conversations — not finalized. Give-back disclosure and contract-brew terms in particular require counsel review before external use.